Street Capitalist: Event Driven Value Investments

This week’s column by Jason Zweig (Take a Deep Breath, Turn Off the TV, Calm Yourself) comes at a good time. The markets are experiencing a level of volatility that they haven’t been through in a long time. Such wild swings in stock prices have the ability to induce fear in investors, causing them to make gaffes like selling companies too early or racking up high commission fees by engaging in frequent trades.

According to Zweig, fear is contagious:

You can catch other people’s emotions as easily as you can catch a cold. In an experiment by neuroscientist Elizabeth Phelps at New York University, people either watched someone else get a mildly painful electric shock or suffered the shock themselves. Their brain responses and their dread before the shock were highly similar in both cases, suggesting that seeing another person’s fear is all it takes to make us afraid. Even encountering the circumstances under which the other person was shocked is enough to trigger your own fear.

When you cave to fear, you cease being a rational investor. You stop looking at the fundamentals and instead submit to your emotions. Often, it’s this sort of investing that ruins your portfolio.

To master fear, Zweig outlines four rules:

Break the circle. Instead of socializing with other investors nursing their losses, hang out with folks who do not obsess over the market. You are less likely to be spooked by dilated pupils, grim faces and quavering voices.

The idea of breaking your circle is one which I believe is practiced by a number of prominent value investors. They may talk about the market with their teams and associates, but they tend to reside away from Wall Street where they would be incessantly affected by the buzz of brokers and investors on Wall Street. Being away from the commotion of the markets can allow an investor to have the peace of mind needed to buck the trend or chaos that might ensue when the markets panic.

Value investors operate out of many places besides Wall Street: Warren Buffett in Omaha, Seth Klarman (of the Baupost Group) in Massachusetts, Mason Hawkins (of Longleaf Funds) in Memphis, Mohnish Pabrai in Irvine, and Bruce Berkowitz (of the Fairholme Fund) in Florida. All of these investors have had good long term track records while residing away from Wall Street.

Turn off the tube. The sight and sound of screaming traders with fear in their eyes are enough to fill you with fright, whether you are conscious of it or not. If hitting the mute button won’t suffice to calm you down, turn off the TV.

Here, I’d also recommend to be cautious of the internet as well. Many investors also like to visit message boards like on Yahoo for the specific companies they own. Many of these message boards can be cesspools of rumors and lies. During a time when the market is being excessively volatile, you risk letting your guard down and listening to these deceiving liars.

It’s important that you keep up to date with news on your companies, but you should do so by utilizing more official means of information. Instead of looking at the prices of diving charts that they show on CNBC, you should take the time to see if what’s going on in the market can actually affect the businesses you own. With Warren Buffett now buying stocks personally, it’s easy to see that he believes some businesses have been oversold. That does not mean that all are oversold, some sectors will probably be in for tough times. Anything with excessive leverage could be at the mercy of their spooked creditors.

Think positive. When Warren Buffett feels his blood pressure rising or his nerves on edge, he calms himself down by gazing at snapshots of his family or playing a game of bridge with his friends.

In The Snowball, Alice Schroeder described how Warren Buffett was excellent at compartmentalizing his emotions. This is probably a pretty hard thing for investors to do on their own, but maybe there are some other methods for staying positive. I think that having a system in place for investing or trading helps. By taking a systemic approach, you work to divorce emotions from your investing and really make it a dry activity. Benjamin Graham is said to have had simple forms for security analysts to fill out when investing a particular company – they filled the forms and then checked them against their particular system. If the company appeared cheap enough it was bought.

One idea I’ve heard that sounds interesting is to spend time studying famous leaders through history. We know that Buffett reads a tremendous amount and when he was younger he spent a lot of time reading biographies about famous business leaders (think Carnegie, Rockefeller). Investors could also read about leaders who faced periods of crisis (Churchill for example), the lessons they glean from such experiences could be used to create a powerful latticework of mental models for protecting them against Mr. Market’s swings.

The other factor is to just know yourself and how you react to stressful situations. For Warren Buffett he may like bridge, but perhaps what works for you is a jog or listening to some music. If you understand yourself and your emotions, you should be able to keep positive as the market dives.

Finally Zweig says:

Stick to it. Set yourself the simple, stark goal of investing more money in something you don’t want to own. You may need help fighting your fears, so visit www.stickk.com and make a public commitment to your future action. Buying a stock fund next week is mentally easier than buying it today — especially if you recruit some friends to cheer you on.

Chances are, we’ll be in for more market volatility than what we saw last week. If that’s the case, it’s going to be important for you to learn how to keep your emotions in check and keep your investing method in tact. If you do this, I believe that you’ll be able to take advantage of the market and find some good buys. They probably wont talk about this on CNBC or in the rest of the mainstream media, but when you’re looking at risk. Instead of gauging it by the market’s prices, try the following:

In our opinion, the real risk that an investor must assess is whether his aggregate after-tax receipts from an investment (including those he receives on sale) will, over his prospective holding period, give him at least as much purchasing power as he had to begin with, plus a modest rate of interest on that initial stake. Though this risk cannot be calculated with engineering precision, it can in some cases be judged with a degree of accuracy that is useful.The primary factors bearing upon this evaluation
are:

1) The certainty with which the long-term economic characteristics of the business can be evaluated;

2) The certainty with which management can be evaluated, both as to its ability to realize the full potential of the business and to wisely employ its cash flows;

3) The certainty with which management can be counted on to channel the rewards from the business to the shareholders rather than to itself;

4) The purchase price of the business;

5) The levels of taxation and inflation that will be experienced and that will determine the degree by which an investor’s purchasing-power return is reduced from his gross return.

These factors will probably strike many analysts as unbearably fuzzy, since they cannot be extracted from a data base of any kind. But the difficulty of precisely quantifying these matters does not negate their importance nor is it insuperable. Just as Justice Stewart found it impossible to formulate a test for obscenity but nevertheless asserted, “I know it when I see it,” so also can investors – in an inexact but useful way – “see” the risks inherent in certain investments without reference to complex equations or price histories.

Warren Buffett – Letter to Shareholders (1993)

Jason Zweig’s latest column at the WSJ (Psyching Yourself Up to Let Losers Go ) tackles a tough issue for most investors – when to sell. Selling can be difficult for a variety of reasons, but a big factor is psychology. We don’t like to let go and give up things we’ve bought. Zweig provides us with a telling statistic:

Individual and professional investors alike struggle with selling. Berkeley finance professor Terrance Odean has found that investors are at least 50% more likely to sell their winners than their losers. Among the money managers surveyed by Cabot Research, a Boston consulting firm, fewer than 30% base their sell decisions on “extensive research.” The rest concede they basically sell by the seat of their pants.

To defend our portfolios from our emotions, Zweig offers us six techniques.

1. Use stop-loss orders

I’ve never been a fan of using a stop-loss order on a company’s stock. I know that Investors Business Daily advocates the use of selling whenever a company falls 10% and I think it’s too trivial of a rule. Zweig says that he doesn’t advocate the use of stop losses but prefers “stop look” orders:

Whenever a stock drops, say, 25% below what you paid, automatically review your original top three reasons for buying to see whether they are still valid. That will prevent you from selling without thinking first.

This is a pretty good idea. I practice the same kind of exercise myself. I don’t have any alerts set to tell me when about a drop of 25%, but I do check my company’s prices regularly. An easy way to get notified of drops in your companies can be done with Yahoo Alerts, you can get an e-mail or text message based up requirements you set (price drop/rise or percent drop/rise). Two of my holdings, Air Transport Services Group (NASDAQ: ATSG) and Steak N Shake (NYSE: SNS) have fallen a bit from my initial buying points ($1.70 and $10.00).

In each of these cases, I re-analyzed my investment thesis, to see if anything changed. With ATSG, the fall from $1.70 to below $1.00 was triggered by almost no news. DHL severing business ties with ATSG was already part of my investment idea- so I didn’t see a reason to sell. With SNS, my thesis hinged on Sardar Biglari getting onto the board and gaining control so that he could make the right decisions for the company. I decided that I would not sell till that thesis was properly tested.

2. Don’t Go Far Afield

Here, Zweig recommends buying an industry index if the company you purchased ends up having poor results. I don’t quite agree with this advice. It all seems a little bit like decisions made by an investor who doesn’t know what they’re doing who is trying to catch a trend (and may be too late).

The only time I think that this is valid is when you’re investing in an industry with good economics but where the individual players might be too hard to pick. I’m thinking of Buffett’s investments in pharma with companies like Sanofi Aventis (NYSE: SNY), GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK), and Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ). The difference with Buffett’s investments in pharmaceutical companies is that he still was not buying an ETF, he bought just a few of the players in that industry. An ETF will usually have many more holdings and carry the risk of over diversification.

3. Shop Before You Drop

Zweig’s next technique is a bit better-

Ask yourself: Which stock or fund would I most like to own? Then view your losers as a source of funding to reduce the amount of cash you would otherwise need to raise

Sometimes I think that selling losers can be good, especially if you’re purchasing a better buy. Maybe a new opportunity has presented itself with a higher return or the margin of safety in your losing investment has narrowed.

4. Re-price it.

Here, the idea is to take your original purchase price and divide it by 10 and compare that price with its current price. A simpler method might be to look at the price you’re seeing right now and compare it to your conservative estimate for the company’s margin of safety(the spread between the current price and the company’s intrinsic value you in your eyes). If you’re buying companies at what you think are 50% discounts, you’ll see a wider margin of safety. It will then be up to you to decide if anything has changed.

If the margin of safety has narrowed to a point where maybe the capital could be better used elsewhere, then you should.

5. Follow your sales.

This is some of the best advice in the column.

Using an online portfolio tracker, monitor the returns of all the stocks you sell after you sell them. Studying the aftermath of your mistakes will enable you to learn which you sold too soon and which too late. You cannot improve what you do not measure.

I try to do the same. On my Google Finance page I keep all of my stocks, even after selling them. I like to see what they’re currently doing and learn from my mistakes and the company’s mistakes. By doing this, you expand your circle of competence. It makes me think of a quote from Edward Lampert in Fortune Magazine.

[The] idea of anticipation is key to investing and to business generally. You can’t wait for an opportunity to become obvious. You have to think, “Here’s what other people and companies have done under certain circumstances. Now, under these new circumstances, how is this management likely to behave?” The plays my father designed for me helped me learn to think ahead. Lots of days I asked him, “Why can’t we just invite kids over and play a game?” In order to do something well, he explained, you have to keep practicing and preparing.

And I think that’s one of the more important concepts to keep in mind when investing. You can often draw upon past experiences when making future decisions. The situation might not be entirely the same, but it’s incredibly useful to have that kind of knowledge filed away for future reference.

News stories are already circulating about the poor performance of certain hedge funds (quite a few within the “value” group). While my portfolio is largely concentrated in Fairfax Financial (FFH), its performance has still fallen from its highs and one of my newer positions – Air Transport Services Group (ATSG) is almost 50% lower than my initial position. It is times like these that an investor’s fortitude is really tested and Jason Zweig’s latest Intelligent Investor column How to Control Your Fears In a Fearsome Market (WSJ) provides a solution for us.

Zweig points out that seeing your investments fall actually triggers a neurological response by your brain:

Merely reading the words “market crash” in this sentence can instantaneously jack up your pulse and your blood pressure, the output of your sweat glands and the tension in your muscles. Stress hormones will flood your bloodstream. Your eyes will widen and your nostrils flare, making you hypersensitive to any further danger. All this occurs automatically, involuntarily and unconsciously. You can’t be an intelligent investor if, without even knowing it, you are thinking with the panic button in your brain.

The good news is that these feelings can be controlled. Zweig outlines four steps for controlling your fears. He says first, we need to:

Reappraise. Forget what you paid for that stock or fund; instead, imagine it was a gift. Now that it is priced, say, 20% more cheaply than in December, should you want to return the gift?

I try to use the reappraisal method often. You need to really write out your thesis for investing in a company so that you can test it against any changes in the environment. It’s also pretty helpful to talk to other people about the same idea and get some contrasting opinions – this can test your thesis further.

This line of thinking is similar to what Zweig advocates next:

Step outside yourself. Imagine that someone else has suffered these losses. Think of questions you might ask to give that person advice: Other than the price, what else has changed? Is your original rationale for this investment still valid?

Then there is taking yourself away from the market:

Control your cues. Even witnessing someone else’s pain, or glancing into another person’s frightened eyes, can fire up your amygdala. Because fear is as contagious as the flu, quarantine yourself from anyone who obsesses over the momentary twitching of the Dow. Tear yourself away from the computer or television; better yet, while the market is closed, make an advance date with friends or family to get your mind off stocks during market hours.

Many of the best investors spend most of their day reading and researching. There s a definite lack of action, it is the antithesis of day trading. Some of the best investors don’t even reside in financial capitals like New York City or London. They’re often found in places that they are comfortable in. Warren Buffett has Omaha and Sir John Templeton had the Bahamas. By removing yourself from the crowd you give yourself room to think and breathe.

Finally, Zweig ends with a nod to Benjamin Graham:

Track your feelings. Fill in the blanks in this sentence: “Today the Dow closed down [or up] ___ points, and that made me feel __________.” Your emotions shouldn’t be hostage to the actions of the roughly 100 million other people who compose the collective beast that Benjamin Graham called “Mr. Market.”

The daily movements of the market are just noise; they burden us and cloud our judgment. I find that it is helpful to not really look at the movement of the market every day. One of the things I’ve noticed is that over and over, when investors like Buffett are on CNBC or Bloomberg they’re asked poor questions like “futures have moved X this morning, what are you thinking?”Often the answer is that they don’t care because it has no impact on their own investing.

Zweig’s checklist is excellent and what I like is that it is a systematic approach for re-evaluating your investments and keeping your cool under pressure. By taking this kind of approach, you distance yourself from emotions. Some of this is applicable to trading in general. A friend who recently began day trading told me that his main problem is that he’s nervous when pulling the trigger on buys and sells. I told him that his main issue is that he hasn’t really come up with a system for how he trades. Until he does, he will be at the mercy of his instincts and emotions which will prevent him from acting properly under pressure.

Zweig says that this kind of checklist will help us counteract the signals that our brain sends, so if you aren’t using one already maybe it is worth adopting. If you doubt the effectiveness of a simple checklist look at a graver scenario – being a patient in the intensive care unit at the hospital. Peter Pronovost a critical-care specialist at Johns Hopkins Hospital started employing a checklist at ICUs in 2001 with great success:

Pronovost and his colleagues monitored what happened for a year afterward. The results were so dramatic that they weren’t sure whether to believe them: the ten-day line-infection rate went from eleven per cent to zero. So they followed patients for fifteen more months. Only two line infections occurred during the entire period. They calculated that, in this one hospital, the checklist had prevented forty-three infections and eight deaths, and saved two million dollars in costs…

Within the first three months of the project, the infection rate in Michigan’s I.C.U.s decreased by sixty-six per cent. The typical I.C.U.—including the ones at Sinai-Grace Hospital—cut its quarterly infection rate to zero. Michigan’s infection rates fell so low that its average I.C.U. outperformed ninety per cent of I.C.U.s nationwide. In the Keystone Initiative’s first eighteen months, the hospitals saved an estimated hundred and seventy-five million dollars in costs and more than fifteen hundred lives. The successes have been sustained for almost four years—all because of a stupid little checklist.

The Checklist (The New Yorker)

The I.C.U. and the market have similarities. Both can be complex and terrifying, leading doctors and investors to make mistakes. Pronovost noticed that in many cases at the I.C.U. doctors would forget to take even simple precautions. In a similar sense, an investor may forget the concept of intrinsic value when watching one of their companies dive 50% in one day of trading. If you believe that in order to make out-sized market beating returns you have to take a contrarian approach, then you will have to master your fears and emotions. A checklist provides an easy way to do both.

Most readers will recognize Jason Zweig as the guy who revised The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham. In the 2003 annual letter (PDF) to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders, Warren Buffett Remarked that The Intelligent Investor is his “favorite book on investing” and that Zweig did a “first-class job in revising” it.

This was actually one of the first investing books that I read. What I liked most was Zweig’s own remarks after every chapter. Zweig was able to take a book written a long time ago and make it easy to digest and show how Benjamin Graham’s concepts parallel what is going on in modern financial markets. The commentary he added was helpful because even if some of the material was hard to understand, I was able to come back to it after reading the commentary.

So today I was pleased to see that Zweig would be penning a new column at the WSJ. Zweig says:

In the last long bear market, 1969 to 1982, stocks returned just 5.6% annually; after inflation, investors lost more than 2% a year. That mauling by the bear made stocks so inexpensive that over the ensuing 18 years they went up 18.5% a year, enough to turn $10,000 into more than $200,000.

The people who so far this year have yanked $39 billion out of U.S. stock funds, and $6 billion out of exchange-traded stock funds, do not understand this. But if you are still in your saving and investing years, a bear market is a gift from the financial gods — and the longer it lasts, the better off you will be. Instead of running from the bear, you should embrace him.

This new column takes its name from the classic book by Benjamin Graham, who wrote that “the investor’s chief problem — and even his worst enemy — is likely to be himself.” I hope to help you understand the chaotic markets around you, and the even more treacherous enemy within. For, as Mr. Buffett has also pointed out, investing is much like dieting: It is simple, but not easy. Everyone knows what it takes to lose weight. (Eat less, exercise more.) Nothing could be simpler, but few things are harder in a world full of chocolate cake and Cheetos.

Stop Worrying, and Learn to Love the Bear (WSJ)

With many investors hurting right now, a Graham themed column might be just what they need. It would prevent them from pulling out of the markets all together and instead expose them to concepts like Mr. Market and the need for a margin of safety when you invest in companies. Those two ideas will be essential for surviving and thriving in the negative market we seem to be in.

It looks like the WSJ has not set up an RSS feed yet for Zweig’s column, but since I’m really looking forward to them I’ll be linking and posting excerpts whenever I see them.