<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cognitive Fluency: Easy = True</title>
	<atom:link href="http://streetcapitalist.com/2010/02/01/cognitive-fluency-easy-true/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2010/02/01/cognitive-fluency-easy-true/</link>
	<description>Wisdom on such diverse topics as: spin-offs, merger arbitrage, post-bankruptcy equities, global macro commentary and short ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:16:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: forexqs</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2010/02/01/cognitive-fluency-easy-true/comment-page-1/#comment-4934</link>
		<dc:creator>forexqs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=887#comment-4934</guid>
		<description>I like this blog and i well viset agen thank you&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://forexqs.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://forexqs.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this blog and i well viset agen thank you<br /><a href="http://forexqs.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://forexqs.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tariq</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2010/02/01/cognitive-fluency-easy-true/comment-page-1/#comment-4932</link>
		<dc:creator>Tariq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=887#comment-4932</guid>
		<description>I agree, Gladwell has a real gift at communicating complex research to normal people. I know that he is sometimes criticized for simplifying things too much, but its pretty effective for exposing that kind of work to ordinary people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Gladwell has a real gift at communicating complex research to normal people. I know that he is sometimes criticized for simplifying things too much, but its pretty effective for exposing that kind of work to ordinary people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tariq</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2010/02/01/cognitive-fluency-easy-true/comment-page-1/#comment-4931</link>
		<dc:creator>Tariq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=887#comment-4931</guid>
		<description>My guess would be yes, but being conscious of such a bias may limit its effectiveness</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess would be yes, but being conscious of such a bias may limit its effectiveness</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the_deliman</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2010/02/01/cognitive-fluency-easy-true/comment-page-1/#comment-4930</link>
		<dc:creator>the_deliman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=887#comment-4930</guid>
		<description>I suspect this is one reason why Gladwell&#039;s work appeals to so many, besides being fascinating and informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect this is one reason why Gladwell&#39;s work appeals to so many, besides being fascinating and informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2010/02/01/cognitive-fluency-easy-true/comment-page-1/#comment-4929</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=887#comment-4929</guid>
		<description>Amazing picture. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder about implications for internal thought processes. For example, if we form internal arguments using natural language, are we more susceptible to self-persuasion than if we used abstract terms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing picture. </p>
<p>I wonder about implications for internal thought processes. For example, if we form internal arguments using natural language, are we more susceptible to self-persuasion than if we used abstract terms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
