Street Capitalist: Event Driven Value Investments

Wisdom on such diverse topics as: spin-offs, merger arbitrage, post-bankruptcy equities, global macro commentary and short ideas.


Street Capitalist: Event Driven Value Investments

Eddie Lampert Distributes Shares of SHLD, AZO, and AN

As most of you know, Eddie Lampert’s investment vehicles ESL Investments and RBS Partners have substantial stakes in three businesses: Sears Holdings (NYSE:SHLD), AutoZone (NYSE:AZO), and AutoNation (NYSE:AN).

(HT: Matt Miller) On January 11, his investment vehicles filed three SEC Form 4 filings, detailing an interesting transaction

Sears Holdings

ESL Institutional Partners, L.P. (“Institutional”) distributed these shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Sears Holdings Corporation (“Shares”) to its general partner, RBS Investment Management, L.L.C. (“RBSIM”), in an in-kind pro rata distribution for no consideration. RBSIM then distributed these Shares to its members in an in-kind pro rata distribution for no consideration.

RBS Partners, L.P. (“RBS”) distributed these Shares to its partners in an in-kind pro rata distribution for no consideration.

ESL Investment Management, L.P. (“ESLIM”) distributed these Shares to its partners in an in-kind pro rata distribution for no consideration.

These Shares include 3,565,316 Shares distributed by RBS in an in-kind pro rata distribution for no consideration, 244,153 Shares distributed by RBSIM in an in-kind pro rata distribution for no consideration and 15,678 Shares distributed by ESLIM in an in-kind pro rata distribution for no consideration. As a result of these distributions, Mr. Lampert directly holds Shares in which he previously had an indirect interest. The distributions did not change Mr. Lampert’s overall pecuniary interest in securities of Sears Holdings Corporation.

Sears Holdings SEC Form 4

AutoZone

ESL Institutional Partners, L.P. (“Institutional”) distributed these shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of AutoZone, Inc. (“Shares”) to its general partner, RBS Investment Management, L.L.C. (“RBSIM”), in an in-kind pro rata distribution for no consideration. RBSIM then distributed these Shares to its members in an in-kind pro rata distribution for no consideration.

RBS Partners, L.P. (“RBS”) distributed these Shares to its partners in an in-kind pro rata distribution for no consideration.

These Shares include 792,882 Shares distributed by RBS in an in-kind pro rata distribution for no consideration and 48,659 Shares distributed by RBSIM in an in-kind pro rata distribution for no consideration. As a result of these distributions, Mr. Lampert directly holds Shares in which he previously had an indirect interest. The distributions did not change Mr. Lampert’s overall pecuniary interest in securities of AutoZone, Inc.

AutoZone SEC Form 4

AutoNation

ESL Institutional Partners, L.P. (“Institutional”) distributed these shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of AutoNation, Inc. (“Shares”) to its general partner, RBS Investment Management, L.L.C. (“RBSIM”), in an in-kind pro rata distribution for no consideration. RBSIM then distributed these Shares to its members in an in-kind pro rata distribution for no consideration.

AutoNation SEC Form 4

These transactions all appear to be doing the same thing, taking major holdings of ESL/RBS and giving them to investors in their funds. The reasons for doing such a transaction can vary. Think back to when Warren Buffett decided to unwind his partnership. He liquidated assets, paying a small dividend, and also distributed shares of Berkshire — which he was chairman of. For an investor in his partnership, they could either keep their faith in him and hold on to their Berkshire shares or sell. You all know how that turned out.

For Lampert, there could be other reasons too. Some funds that take controlling stakes and then decide to wind down find it more efficient to distribute out large holdings rather than sell them onto the open market. Or, it could be a way to give investors in the fund an opportunity to be extricated from having such large holdings have a dominant influence on returns. This will be a situation to watch for any Sears, AutoZone, or AutoNation holder.

Category: Eddie Lampert, Superinvestors

  • sclarksons

    If you read all the filings, it actually appears that at least some of the shares were transferred from the partners into entities that lampert controls.
    (this is with regard to SHLD, I haven't read the others, though they seemed the same at a glance)
    In the latest filing, there are also about 70,000 fewer total SHLD shares accounted for than were on the last 13-hf, so perhaps someone withdrew from the fund after the year end, and (speculating this) Lampert took his pay for the year in shares for the rest.

    It also says this in the filing:
    “As a result of these distributions, Mr. Lampert directly holds Shares in which he previously had an indirect interest. The distributions did not change Mr. Lampert's overall pecuniary interest in securities of Sears Holdings Corporation.”

    Last year or the year before (time flies in a crisis) there was a form 4 filing that resulted in an “increased pecuniary interest.” but that was in the summer I believe (at around $135, so it must have been two years ago.)

    If you work under the assumption that Lampert wants out of the hedge fund biz, and into the holding company management biz (which is one possible scenario to be sure) then I suspect that he does not PERSONALLY own enough shares to control the entity after wrapping up the hedge fund.
    -forbes estimated his net worth at less than 4B a couple of years ago I think, and that was when the sears position was over 10 B, so figure he might personally own 20-25% of the 65 million shares at ESL, or around 15-20%. Lots, to be sure, but not enough to cash out now.

    thus, continued buybacks at the holding company, and slow distributions could ultimately result in personal control…
    either way, I think the stock is still a reasonable value at 12B, 15B EV, with 1.7 B in cash flow and obsessively shareholder focused management, a 35 million share float, and 14 million short interest on top of that. at $100 dollars, that's a 1.4 billion short position, on top of 3.5 billion publicly traded stock. Look out above!

  • http://gulicio.us gulicious

    Is this a normal occurrence? I saw these transactions posted on Yahoo finance tonight and wondered what it all meant. Threre is a close connection between the three companies and I just don't know what to do… I am an owner of SHLD for some time and have done very well. I don't know if this even matters to my investment thesis but overall, I would have heard more chatter about the transaction which happened on the 11th. Certainly this stock is followed in larger droves – I didn't even see conspiracy theorists amok. Let us know in a future post what you believe the motivations may be or where it can lead. Thanks.

About Me

My name is Tariq Ali, I run Street Capitalist. I recently graduated from the University of Texas at Austin. There, I stumbled onto value investing via the school library. I read everything I could and now I'm here, writing out my thoughts and investment ideas.


I have a lot of heroes when it comes to investing, it seems like every investor has some kind of niche. Some, whose books and writings have had the biggest impact on me are: Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Joel Greenblatt, Seth Klarman, and George Soros.


Have any questions? Want to stay in touch?
Feel free to e-mail me at TariqTX@gmail.com


Follow me on Twitter:
@ValueInvestr

E-Mail Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Post Categories

Monthly Archives