<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CEO Pay and Industry Favorability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://streetcapitalist.com/2009/08/18/ceo-pay-and-industry-favorability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2009/08/18/ceo-pay-and-industry-favorability/</link>
	<description>Wisdom on such diverse topics as: spin-offs, merger arbitrage, post-bankruptcy equities, global macro commentary and short ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 04:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tariq</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2009/08/18/ceo-pay-and-industry-favorability/comment-page-1/#comment-4886</link>
		<dc:creator>Tariq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=705#comment-4886</guid>
		<description>I figured there was something going on with that. Thanks for the clarification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured there was something going on with that. Thanks for the clarification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2009/08/18/ceo-pay-and-industry-favorability/comment-page-1/#comment-4885</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=705#comment-4885</guid>
		<description>The Schwartzman thing is ridiculous. He didn&#039;t receive that as compensation. When they went public, he converted his equity in BX LP into prefered units that vest over 4 years. That $700m is just the transfer of a prefered unit into a common, essentially. The only difference between the two is a PERSONALLY agreed upon serveral year vesting period (beyond the requirements of SEC required lock-ups) vests. Essentially moving from self-appointed illiquidity to liquidity. It is a return on capital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Schwartzman thing is ridiculous. He didn&#39;t receive that as compensation. When they went public, he converted his equity in BX LP into prefered units that vest over 4 years. That $700m is just the transfer of a prefered unit into a common, essentially. The only difference between the two is a PERSONALLY agreed upon serveral year vesting period (beyond the requirements of SEC required lock-ups) vests. Essentially moving from self-appointed illiquidity to liquidity. It is a return on capital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tariq</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2009/08/18/ceo-pay-and-industry-favorability/comment-page-1/#comment-4799</link>
		<dc:creator>Tariq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=705#comment-4799</guid>
		<description>I figured there was something going on with that. Thanks for the clarification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured there was something going on with that. Thanks for the clarification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2009/08/18/ceo-pay-and-industry-favorability/comment-page-1/#comment-4798</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=705#comment-4798</guid>
		<description>The Schwartzman thing is ridiculous. He didn&#039;t receive that as compensation. When they went public, he converted his equity in BX LP into prefered units that vest over 4 years. That $700m is just the transfer of a prefered unit into a common, essentially. The only difference between the two is a PERSONALLY agreed upon serveral year vesting period (beyond the requirements of SEC required lock-ups) vests. Essentially moving from self-appointed illiquidity to liquidity. It is a return on capital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Schwartzman thing is ridiculous. He didn&#39;t receive that as compensation. When they went public, he converted his equity in BX LP into prefered units that vest over 4 years. That $700m is just the transfer of a prefered unit into a common, essentially. The only difference between the two is a PERSONALLY agreed upon serveral year vesting period (beyond the requirements of SEC required lock-ups) vests. Essentially moving from self-appointed illiquidity to liquidity. It is a return on capital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2009/08/18/ceo-pay-and-industry-favorability/comment-page-1/#comment-4797</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=705#comment-4797</guid>
		<description>The Schwartzman thing is ridiculous. He didn&#039;t receive that as compensation. When they went public, he converted his equity in BX LP into prefered units that vest over 4 years. That $700m is just the transfer of a prefered unit into a common, essentially. The only difference between the two is a PERSONALLY agreed upon serveral year vesting period (beyond the requirements of SEC required lock-ups) vests. Essentially moving from self-appointed illiquidity to liquidity. It is a return on capital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Schwartzman thing is ridiculous. He didn&#39;t receive that as compensation. When they went public, he converted his equity in BX LP into prefered units that vest over 4 years. That $700m is just the transfer of a prefered unit into a common, essentially. The only difference between the two is a PERSONALLY agreed upon serveral year vesting period (beyond the requirements of SEC required lock-ups) vests. Essentially moving from self-appointed illiquidity to liquidity. It is a return on capital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

