<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Timberland: Growing Returns!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://streetcapitalist.com/2009/01/28/timberland-growing-returns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2009/01/28/timberland-growing-returns/</link>
	<description>Wisdom on such diverse topics as: spin-offs, merger arbitrage, post-bankruptcy equities, global macro commentary and short ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 04:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 52wallst</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2009/01/28/timberland-growing-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-4663</link>
		<dc:creator>52wallst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=447#comment-4663</guid>
		<description>The most popular asset class that large pension funds and endowments have been moving money into according to Pensions &amp; Investments is timberland. So some new, potentially speculative, money is starting to move into a space that has long been ignored, at least in my perception. The recent large gains could be the result of these large inflows. I would like to point out some characteristics and risks that come with investing in the land piece of timberland, besides the obvious of illiquidity to help get a better understanding of the underlying economics of land. 
 
-First, the tax treatment allows only for capital gains and there is no tax depreciation (land is held at historical cost under US GAAP).  
 
-Second, since the land itself generates no income, expenses are capitalized.  
 
-Third, and most important to consider, there is a cost of carry (which includes maintenance, taxes, etc.) with land that must be paid with other income because land itself doesn&#039;t generate income (in this case, most likely income from the timber).  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most popular asset class that large pension funds and endowments have been moving money into according to Pensions &amp; Investments is timberland. So some new, potentially speculative, money is starting to move into a space that has long been ignored, at least in my perception. The recent large gains could be the result of these large inflows. I would like to point out some characteristics and risks that come with investing in the land piece of timberland, besides the obvious of illiquidity to help get a better understanding of the underlying economics of land. </p>
<p>-First, the tax treatment allows only for capital gains and there is no tax depreciation (land is held at historical cost under US GAAP).  </p>
<p>-Second, since the land itself generates no income, expenses are capitalized.  </p>
<p>-Third, and most important to consider, there is a cost of carry (which includes maintenance, taxes, etc.) with land that must be paid with other income because land itself doesn&#039;t generate income (in this case, most likely income from the timber).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 52wallst</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2009/01/28/timberland-growing-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-5733</link>
		<dc:creator>52wallst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=447#comment-5733</guid>
		<description>The most popular asset class that large pension funds and endowments have been moving money into according to Pensions &amp; Investments is timberland. So some new, potentially speculative, money is starting to move into a space that has long been ignored, at least in my perception. The recent large gains could be the result of these large inflows. I would like to point out some characteristics and risks that come with investing in the land piece of timberland, besides the obvious of illiquidity to help get a better understanding of the underlying economics of land. 
 
-First, the tax treatment allows only for capital gains and there is no tax depreciation (land is held at historical cost under US GAAP).  
 
-Second, since the land itself generates no income, expenses are capitalized.  
 
-Third, and most important to consider, there is a cost of carry (which includes maintenance, taxes, etc.) with land that must be paid with other income because land itself doesn&#039;t generate income (in this case, most likely income from the timber).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most popular asset class that large pension funds and endowments have been moving money into according to Pensions &amp; Investments is timberland. So some new, potentially speculative, money is starting to move into a space that has long been ignored, at least in my perception. The recent large gains could be the result of these large inflows. I would like to point out some characteristics and risks that come with investing in the land piece of timberland, besides the obvious of illiquidity to help get a better understanding of the underlying economics of land. </p>
<p>-First, the tax treatment allows only for capital gains and there is no tax depreciation (land is held at historical cost under US GAAP).  </p>
<p>-Second, since the land itself generates no income, expenses are capitalized.  </p>
<p>-Third, and most important to consider, there is a cost of carry (which includes maintenance, taxes, etc.) with land that must be paid with other income because land itself doesn&#039;t generate income (in this case, most likely income from the timber).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fernando</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2009/01/28/timberland-growing-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-2703</link>
		<dc:creator>fernando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=447#comment-2703</guid>
		<description>the market seem to care more about the dividend yield than the real value of the company</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the market seem to care more about the dividend yield than the real value of the company</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fernando</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2009/01/28/timberland-growing-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-5732</link>
		<dc:creator>fernando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=447#comment-5732</guid>
		<description>the market seem to care more about the dividend yield than the real value of the company</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the market seem to care more about the dividend yield than the real value of the company</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

