Street Capitalist: Event Driven Value Investments

Wisdom on such diverse topics as: spin-offs, merger arbitrage, post-bankruptcy equities, global macro commentary and short ideas.


Street Capitalist: Event Driven Value Investments

Warren Buffett on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

CNBC featured a great audio interview with Warren Buffett today about the Treasury’s decision to intervene in Fannie Mae (NYSE:FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE:FRE). Here’s a few key quotes:

Becky Quick: Mr. Buffett, thank you for joining us this morning. I want to get your thoughts on this plan for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Warren Buffett: Well, I think the Secretary (Paulson) did exactly the right thing. I don’t think there was an alternative that was anywhere close to this one in terms of calming the markets, in terms of providing an ongoing function for the two that makes any change less abrupt, the changes that are going to occur with the two companies. So I couldn’t, I wouldn’t have changed anything in the plan myself.

On systemic risk:

Joe: You could argue about Bear Stearns, Warren, about whether the systemic risk of Bear Stearns would have affected securities world-wide. Hard to argue with this one. I would say, being Berkshire Holdings, I mean, you’re probably breathing a sigh of relief. You’ve got some derivatives, you’ve got across the board a lot of different securities that could have been affected very negatively, I guess, if this hadn’t been done. You must be breathing a sigh of relief as well, right?

Buffett: Well, I suppose you could say that, although Joe, I would say that if there is chaos in the market, if would probably net as good for us over a long period of time. But you’re quite correct that, if Bear Stearns was an 8.5 on the Richter, the financial Richter scale, this was about a 9.9 or something of the sort. It would, the government really had no choice but to do something, and the question is, is what they did the most sensible thing, and they did do that.

Carl Quintanilla: Warren, you’ve been on this show more than a couple times telling people that the economic correction we’re in is going to be harder, deeper, more severe than a lot of people expect. Has the move by Treasury done anything to alter your macro view?

Buffett: Well, they’ve certainly done the right thing. So, where it would have been without doing this, I think, would have been worse than having done this. Now it doesn’t solve all our problems or anything of the sort, but it’s a big, big step in the right direction.

Warren Buffett Tells CNBC Treasury “Did Exactly the Right Thing” on Fannie/Freddie (CNBC)

Right now a lot of libertarian or proponents of completely free markets are denouncing the plan and comparing it to communism. The characterizations may be fair, and this may be bad for moral hazard – but what other choice did they have? It’s great in theory, but that kind of action just does not play in the real world when the consequences fall on the public.

warren buffett ice cream

Like Buffett says, if the Treasury had not done this, we’d be much worse off. Buffett does not go into detail on what he thinks that scenario would have been like, but Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution puts forward a pretty convincing case for intervention:

Let’s say that the Treasury did not support the debt of the mortgage agencies. The Chinese bought over $300 billion of that stuff and they were told that it is essentially riskless. The flow of capital from them and from other central banks, sovereign wealth funds, and plain old ordinary investors would shut down very quickly. The dollar would fall say 30-40 percent in a week, there would be payments system gridlock, margin calls at the clearinghouses would go unmet, and only a trading shutdown would stop the Dow from shedding half its value. Most of the U.S. banking system would be insolvent. Emergency Fed/Treasury action would recapitalize the FDIC but we would lose an independent central bank and setting the money supply would be a crapshoot. The rate of unemployment would climb into double digits and stay there. Many Americans would not have access to their savings. The future supply of foreign investment would be noticeably lower. The Federal government would lose its AAA rating and we would pay much more in borrowing costs. The deficit would skyrocket.

What if we didn’t bail out the creditors? (Marginal Revolution)

Category: Global Macro, Mental Models, Warren Buffett

  • Travis
    An interesting Analogy from the NY SUN that doesn't make everything seem so cut and dry(saw this on bank stocks.com):

    "Imagine if the Bush administration, having decided that gasoline prices are too high, decided to nationalize ExxonMobil. The federal energy secretary held a Sunday press conference to announce that the Bush administration had replaced the company's management, that the company would henceforth be run with the goal of reducing gasoline prices for drivers, and that any profits the company made would be the property of the federal government, which would now control 80% of the company. As for the company's existing shareholders, they are out of luck — they won't get any more dividends; they won't even get a chance to vote on the deal.

    Substitute mortgage prices for gasoline prices and you get a pretty good sense of what the Bush administration and its secretary of the Treasury, Henry Paulson, did over the weekend in respect of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The administration decided that its interest in low mortgage rates as an artificial boost to housing prices was more important than the property rights of the shareholders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. So without even so much as a shareholder vote, the companies were nationalized."

    This does seems obviously unconstitutional, but since the formations of the GSE's is also constitutionally questionable I didn't bother bringing it up. Specifically the whole thing is questionable under the contracts clause:

    "No State shall [...] pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts[...]"
    and the Fifth amendment:

    "No person shall [... ]be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

    I suppose we're I a GSE's stock holder I'd be feeling pretty darn deprived and uncompensated right about now. (I'm not. After having an entire bank robbed out from under me--INDYMAC, Thanks Mr. Schumer-- I don't want anything to do with a stock with even a whiff of Government on it. )
  • Travis
    Ah. I see you point. I suppose I agree. I have a position in PRS, which likely insures GSE debt. I think this is going to work out in my favor from that angle, though even that seems to be up in the air. Though I have to admit to not knowing enough to say which would be better in the long run. I just hate to see free markets blamed for what is clearly a government induced problem. "It’s going to be up to politicians now to make sure the entities are scaled back, and that’s the scary part. I think Barney Frank was balking at that." Good point! I didn't think of that, and your right its terrifying. Since the GSE's won't be wound up any time soon, it will be the next administration who will decide what actually happens to them. With regulators in control, under the president one could imagine them used for all kinds of mischief without even bothering to consult congress. One that's not even a stretch is zero interest loans for the poor for instance. But they could also expand into other lines of "business" . Health insurance for instance? This bares careful watching.

    By the way you have a great blog here. I check in everyday.
  • Travis, I agree - a lot of this stems from their inception as a mixed entity and that's always dangerous. What I don't agree with is people like Jim Rogers coming on and saying we should have just let them default. It was a lose lose proposition either way but the course of action taken is probably the lesser of the two evils.

    It's going to be up to politicians now to make sure the entities are scaled back, and that's the scary part. I think Barney Frank was balking at that.
  • Travis
    "Right now a lot of libertarian or proponents of completely free markets are denouncing the plan and comparing it to communism. The characterizations may be fair, and this may be bad for moral hazard - but what other choice did they have? It’s great in theory, but that kind of action just does not play in the real world when the consequences fall on the public."

    I couldn't disagree more. This government take over was bound to happen when the government first created the GSE's. If the GSE's had never been created, this risk would be spread over many more companies, and our whole economy would not be ready to topple at the fall a a couple a mortgage lenders. I think this is an I told you so moment for Capitalists. Mixed economies don't work, they only slide towards full government control and that's what we are seeing. The government creates a mess by interfering with the market. They then, under the guise of saving the day, claim even more power. Which of course causes another mess, which allows them to claim more power, and on and on we go. Looking back over history its a dominant theme in the development of our country. Personally, on the scale of things, I consider this a win, since I understand they are being forced to drastically shrink their portfolios.
blog comments powered by Disqus

About Me

My name is Tariq Ali, I run Street Capitalist. I recently graduated from the University of Texas at Austin. There, I stumbled onto value investing via the school library. I read everything I could and now I'm here, writing out my thoughts and investment ideas.


I have a lot of heroes when it comes to investing, it seems like every investor has some kind of niche. Some, whose books and writings have had the biggest impact on me are: Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Joel Greenblatt, Seth Klarman, and George Soros.


Have any questions? Want to stay in touch?
Feel free to e-mail me at TariqTX@gmail.com


Follow me on Twitter:
@ValueInvestr

E-Mail Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Post Categories

Monthly Archives