<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jason Zweig Pens Intelligent Investor Column at WSJ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/07/12/jason-zweig-pens-intelligent-investor-column-at-wsj/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/07/12/jason-zweig-pens-intelligent-investor-column-at-wsj/</link>
	<description>Wisdom on such diverse topics as: spin-offs, merger arbitrage, post-bankruptcy equities, global macro commentary and short ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 04:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tariq</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/07/12/jason-zweig-pens-intelligent-investor-column-at-wsj/comment-page-1/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Tariq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=183#comment-598</guid>
		<description>David you&#039;re right. The page I was quoting from had a typo. It&#039;s Debt/Equity &lt; 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David you&#8217;re right. The page I was quoting from had a typo. It&#8217;s Debt/Equity < 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tariq</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/07/12/jason-zweig-pens-intelligent-investor-column-at-wsj/comment-page-1/#comment-5674</link>
		<dc:creator>Tariq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=183#comment-5674</guid>
		<description>David you&#039;re right. The page I was quoting from had a typo. It&#039;s Debt/Equity &lt; 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David you&#8217;re right. The page I was quoting from had a typo. It&#8217;s Debt/Equity &lt; 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/07/12/jason-zweig-pens-intelligent-investor-column-at-wsj/comment-page-1/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=183#comment-596</guid>
		<description>Dear Tariq. Debt/Equity &gt;1 strikes me as very odd as the thing to look for as a sign of a good stock. Perhaps D/E less than 1 is the right stuff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tariq. Debt/Equity &gt;1 strikes me as very odd as the thing to look for as a sign of a good stock. Perhaps D/E less than 1 is the right stuff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/07/12/jason-zweig-pens-intelligent-investor-column-at-wsj/comment-page-1/#comment-5673</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=183#comment-5673</guid>
		<description>Dear Tariq. Debt/Equity &gt;1 strikes me as very odd as the thing to look for as a sign of a good stock. Perhaps D/E less than 1 is the right stuff?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tariq. Debt/Equity &gt;1 strikes me as very odd as the thing to look for as a sign of a good stock. Perhaps D/E less than 1 is the right stuff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tariq</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/07/12/jason-zweig-pens-intelligent-investor-column-at-wsj/comment-page-1/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Tariq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=183#comment-539</guid>
		<description>Lowell, simultaneously at around 1976 Benjamin Graham was advocating the use of a stock screen:

&quot;In his next interview published in Medical Economics, September 20, 1976 titled “The Simplest Way to Select Bargain Stocks” Graham, then 82, proposed a simpler, more refined formula that consisted of:

PE Ratio of 7x-10x or less (Based on 2x current AAA bond rates)*;
Equity/Asset Ration of .5 or more (e.g. Debt/Equity &gt;1).&quot;

I think that the line you&#039;re quoting is not so much a vote of confidence for EMH, but rather a suggestion that you do not have to partake in extensive security analysis to yield good returns - you can use less intensive methods like his screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lowell, simultaneously at around 1976 Benjamin Graham was advocating the use of a stock screen:</p>
<p>&#8220;In his next interview published in Medical Economics, September 20, 1976 titled “The Simplest Way to Select Bargain Stocks” Graham, then 82, proposed a simpler, more refined formula that consisted of:</p>
<p>PE Ratio of 7x-10x or less (Based on 2x current AAA bond rates)*;<br />
Equity/Asset Ration of .5 or more (e.g. Debt/Equity &gt;1).&#8221;</p>
<p>I think that the line you&#8217;re quoting is not so much a vote of confidence for EMH, but rather a suggestion that you do not have to partake in extensive security analysis to yield good returns &#8211; you can use less intensive methods like his screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tariq</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/07/12/jason-zweig-pens-intelligent-investor-column-at-wsj/comment-page-1/#comment-5672</link>
		<dc:creator>Tariq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=183#comment-5672</guid>
		<description>Lowell, simultaneously at around 1976 Benjamin Graham was advocating the use of a stock screen:

&quot;In his next interview published in Medical Economics, September 20, 1976 titled “The Simplest Way to Select Bargain Stocks” Graham, then 82, proposed a simpler, more refined formula that consisted of:

PE Ratio of 7x-10x or less (Based on 2x current AAA bond rates)*;
Equity/Asset Ration of .5 or more (e.g. Debt/Equity &gt;1).&quot;

I think that the line you&#039;re quoting is not so much a vote of confidence for EMH, but rather a suggestion that you do not have to partake in extensive security analysis to yield good returns - you can use less intensive methods like his screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lowell, simultaneously at around 1976 Benjamin Graham was advocating the use of a stock screen:</p>
<p>&#8220;In his next interview published in Medical Economics, September 20, 1976 titled “The Simplest Way to Select Bargain Stocks” Graham, then 82, proposed a simpler, more refined formula that consisted of:</p>
<p>PE Ratio of 7x-10x or less (Based on 2x current AAA bond rates)*;<br />
Equity/Asset Ration of .5 or more (e.g. Debt/Equity &gt;1).&#8221;</p>
<p>I think that the line you&#8217;re quoting is not so much a vote of confidence for EMH, but rather a suggestion that you do not have to partake in extensive security analysis to yield good returns &#8211; you can use less intensive methods like his screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lowell Herr</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/07/12/jason-zweig-pens-intelligent-investor-column-at-wsj/comment-page-1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Lowell Herr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=183#comment-538</guid>
		<description>Here is my favorite quote by Benjamin Graham which he gave to the Financial Analysts Journal in 1976 shortly before he died.

“I am no longer an advocate of elaborate techniques of security analysis in order to find superior value opportunities. This was a rewarding activity, say, 40 years ago, when Graham and Dodd was first published; but the situation has changed…[Today] I doubt whether such extensive efforts will generate sufficiently superior selections to justify their cost…I’m on the side of the ‘efficient market’ school of thought.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my favorite quote by Benjamin Graham which he gave to the Financial Analysts Journal in 1976 shortly before he died.</p>
<p>“I am no longer an advocate of elaborate techniques of security analysis in order to find superior value opportunities. This was a rewarding activity, say, 40 years ago, when Graham and Dodd was first published; but the situation has changed…[Today] I doubt whether such extensive efforts will generate sufficiently superior selections to justify their cost…I’m on the side of the ‘efficient market’ school of thought.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lowell Herr</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/07/12/jason-zweig-pens-intelligent-investor-column-at-wsj/comment-page-1/#comment-5671</link>
		<dc:creator>Lowell Herr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/?p=183#comment-5671</guid>
		<description>Here is my favorite quote by Benjamin Graham which he gave to the Financial Analysts Journal in 1976 shortly before he died.

“I am no longer an advocate of elaborate techniques of security analysis in order to find superior value opportunities. This was a rewarding activity, say, 40 years ago, when Graham and Dodd was first published; but the situation has changed…[Today] I doubt whether such extensive efforts will generate sufficiently superior selections to justify their cost…I’m on the side of the ‘efficient market’ school of thought.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my favorite quote by Benjamin Graham which he gave to the Financial Analysts Journal in 1976 shortly before he died.</p>
<p>“I am no longer an advocate of elaborate techniques of security analysis in order to find superior value opportunities. This was a rewarding activity, say, 40 years ago, when Graham and Dodd was first published; but the situation has changed…[Today] I doubt whether such extensive efforts will generate sufficiently superior selections to justify their cost…I’m on the side of the ‘efficient market’ school of thought.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

