<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Street Capitalist Portfolio Outperforms (FFH, SNS, ORH, ESMK)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/</link>
	<description>Wisdom on such diverse topics as: spin-offs, merger arbitrage, post-bankruptcy equities, global macro commentary and short ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 04:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tariq</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Tariq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/#comment-192</guid>
		<description>Anonymous, thanks for catching that. I misread PF2&#039;s return from the letter. Still, I think even a -1.2% return when one of your positions goes totally to zero, and a few others fall considerably makes a good case for taking 8-10 concentrated positions like that. 

At the same time though, I know David Einhorn&#039;s Greenlight Capital employs pretty concentrated positions on high conviction ideas -- I think in VII Einhorn stated that at one point Freescale made up 50% of their portfolio. That position really paid off for them.

It&#039;s a bit difficult to know which way is best, I believe Pabrai has stated something like - he never wants any position to really be greater than 10 or 12% of the fund&#039;s total capital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous, thanks for catching that. I misread PF2&#8242;s return from the letter. Still, I think even a -1.2% return when one of your positions goes totally to zero, and a few others fall considerably makes a good case for taking 8-10 concentrated positions like that. </p>
<p>At the same time though, I know David Einhorn&#8217;s Greenlight Capital employs pretty concentrated positions on high conviction ideas &#8212; I think in VII Einhorn stated that at one point Freescale made up 50% of their portfolio. That position really paid off for them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a bit difficult to know which way is best, I believe Pabrai has stated something like &#8211; he never wants any position to really be greater than 10 or 12% of the fund&#8217;s total capital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tariq</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/comment-page-1/#comment-5650</link>
		<dc:creator>Tariq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/#comment-5650</guid>
		<description>Anonymous, thanks for catching that. I misread PF2&#039;s return from the letter. Still, I think even a -1.2% return when one of your positions goes totally to zero, and a few others fall considerably makes a good case for taking 8-10 concentrated positions like that. 

At the same time though, I know David Einhorn&#039;s Greenlight Capital employs pretty concentrated positions on high conviction ideas -- I think in VII Einhorn stated that at one point Freescale made up 50% of their portfolio. That position really paid off for them.

It&#039;s a bit difficult to know which way is best, I believe Pabrai has stated something like - he never wants any position to really be greater than 10 or 12% of the fund&#039;s total capital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous, thanks for catching that. I misread PF2&#8242;s return from the letter. Still, I think even a -1.2% return when one of your positions goes totally to zero, and a few others fall considerably makes a good case for taking 8-10 concentrated positions like that. </p>
<p>At the same time though, I know David Einhorn&#8217;s Greenlight Capital employs pretty concentrated positions on high conviction ideas &#8212; I think in VII Einhorn stated that at one point Freescale made up 50% of their portfolio. That position really paid off for them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a bit difficult to know which way is best, I believe Pabrai has stated something like &#8211; he never wants any position to really be greater than 10 or 12% of the fund&#8217;s total capital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confused</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Confused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Tariq,

Are you sure about Pabrai?  Looking at the numbers on his website, it appears that all three of his funds (PIF2, PIF3 and PIF4) were down for 2007.  Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tariq,</p>
<p>Are you sure about Pabrai?  Looking at the numbers on his website, it appears that all three of his funds (PIF2, PIF3 and PIF4) were down for 2007.  Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confused</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/comment-page-1/#comment-5649</link>
		<dc:creator>Confused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/#comment-5649</guid>
		<description>Tariq,

Are you sure about Pabrai?  Looking at the numbers on his website, it appears that all three of his funds (PIF2, PIF3 and PIF4) were down for 2007.  Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tariq,</p>
<p>Are you sure about Pabrai?  Looking at the numbers on his website, it appears that all three of his funds (PIF2, PIF3 and PIF4) were down for 2007.  Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tariq</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Tariq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Hi Z, yes I did read that article -- I actually read it while writing the above post. Given Fairfax Financial&#039;s recent performance, it seems like a desperate attempt by the shorts to try to manipulate the company&#039;s price.

This really isn&#039;t anything new, for example Peter Eavis repeatedly wrote negative articles on Thestreet.com trying to discredit Fairfax and say that they&#039;re heading to bankruptcy. 

The claims are pretty baseless and I&#039;m not worried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Z, yes I did read that article &#8212; I actually read it while writing the above post. Given Fairfax Financial&#8217;s recent performance, it seems like a desperate attempt by the shorts to try to manipulate the company&#8217;s price.</p>
<p>This really isn&#8217;t anything new, for example Peter Eavis repeatedly wrote negative articles on Thestreet.com trying to discredit Fairfax and say that they&#8217;re heading to bankruptcy. </p>
<p>The claims are pretty baseless and I&#8217;m not worried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tariq</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/comment-page-1/#comment-5648</link>
		<dc:creator>Tariq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/#comment-5648</guid>
		<description>Hi Z, yes I did read that article -- I actually read it while writing the above post. Given Fairfax Financial&#039;s recent performance, it seems like a desperate attempt by the shorts to try to manipulate the company&#039;s price.

This really isn&#039;t anything new, for example Peter Eavis repeatedly wrote negative articles on Thestreet.com trying to discredit Fairfax and say that they&#039;re heading to bankruptcy. 

The claims are pretty baseless and I&#039;m not worried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Z, yes I did read that article &#8212; I actually read it while writing the above post. Given Fairfax Financial&#8217;s recent performance, it seems like a desperate attempt by the shorts to try to manipulate the company&#8217;s price.</p>
<p>This really isn&#8217;t anything new, for example Peter Eavis repeatedly wrote negative articles on Thestreet.com trying to discredit Fairfax and say that they&#8217;re heading to bankruptcy. </p>
<p>The claims are pretty baseless and I&#8217;m not worried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a timely article on a couple of your holdings: 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/30/news/companies/boyd_fairfax.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008013012&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fairfax gets a dose of short medicine&lt;/a&gt;

I was wondering if you had a chance to read it, and if so, what do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a timely article on a couple of your holdings: </p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/30/news/companies/boyd_fairfax.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008013012" rel="nofollow">Fairfax gets a dose of short medicine</a></p>
<p>I was wondering if you had a chance to read it, and if so, what do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/comment-page-1/#comment-5647</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetcapitalist.com/2008/01/30/street-capitalist-portfolio-outperforms-ffh-sns-orh-esmk/#comment-5647</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a timely article on a couple of your holdings: 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/30/news/companies/boyd_fairfax.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008013012&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fairfax gets a dose of short medicine&lt;/a&gt;

I was wondering if you had a chance to read it, and if so, what do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a timely article on a couple of your holdings: </p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/01/30/news/companies/boyd_fairfax.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008013012" rel="nofollow">Fairfax gets a dose of short medicine</a></p>
<p>I was wondering if you had a chance to read it, and if so, what do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

